Sign in

Category: Other

  • Equal-information evaluation of credit assignment in modular financial reinforcement learning

    Equal-information evaluation of credit assignment in modular financial reinforcement learning

    Equal-information evaluation of credit assignment in modular financial reinforcement learning

    arXiv:2610.14750v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Credit assignment in modular financial reinforcement learning is difficult to evaluate because an attributed signal may improve a component loss without adding decision-relevant information or improving economic outcomes. We propose an evaluation framework combining equal-information reconstruction controls, fixed-utility comparisons and prespecified downstream guardrails. The framework is instantiated in an attribution-guided modular trading architecture and tested in three controlled studies covering update allocation, supervision-target representation and portfolio risk control. We find that residual-based allocation is exactly reproduced by an ordinary loss-budget control under the disclosed interface; direct shortfall supervision improves component prediction but fails decoded-outcome preservation; and component-wise critic supervision worsens risk-condition certainty equivalent and drawdown relative to scalar supervision under fixed utility. These results identify three distinct evaluation failures: redundant attribution signals, representation-induced prediction trade-offs, and misalignment between component supervision and downstream risk outcomes. A preserved historical engineering case further shows why module-level learning claims require run-level provenance. The contribution is a reusable methodology for evaluating credit assignment in expert systems operating under partial observability, delayed feedback and economic risk constraints.

    Fallback brief based on the available RSS feed; no unsupported details have been added.

    Source: arXiv
    Original article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14750

  • GateSight: Recurrent Memory Anticipates Attention Memory for Query-Agnostic KV Eviction in Hybrid LLMs

    GateSight: Recurrent Memory Anticipates Attention Memory for Query-Agnostic KV Eviction in Hybrid LLMs

    GateSight: Recurrent Memory Anticipates Attention Memory for Query-Agnostic KV Eviction in Hybrid LLMs

    arXiv:2610.14754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hybrid language models interleave Gated DeltaNet (GDN) layers, whose recurrent memory has a fixed size, with full-attention layers, whose key-value (KV) cache grows with the context and dominates serving memory. In this paper, we ask whether the recurrent memory already knows what the attention memory will need. We first show that which GDN heads of Qwen3.8-27B keep long memories is fixed by the weights rather than by the document. Next, we define the future utility of a KV entry by how much removing it changes the attention output over the model's own continuations, and find that the write gate, decay and write magnitude that GDN layers emit during prefill anticipate this utility before any query is seen. Because the relation is spread across many GDN heads and layers, and a linear map recovers its trend but less of its high-utility tail than a nonlinear one, we propose GateSight, which learns it with lightweight per-head multilayer perceptrons that read these signals and no attention score. Their predicted utility decides which entries each attention layer keeps, and how much each layer keeps is set by the model's native attention output gate, whose mean differs by more than an order of magnitude across layers. Finally, at serving time, GateSight scores the cache once after prefill and physically releases discarded KV entries. Experimental results on SCBench and RULER-4096 with Qwen3.8-27B and, with the same recipe, the sparse-attention model Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, up to the 262K-token limit of the models, show that with a tenth of the attention KV cache, GateSight is the most accurate of five query-agnostic methods on three of the four model-benchmark pairs and leads KVzip on all four, by 9.5 to 47.2 points. Notably, it scores a full-length context with negligible overhead relative to prefill.

    Fallback brief based on the available RSS feed; no unsupported details have been added.

    Source: arXiv
    Original article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14754

  • CUSE: Fine-Grained Multimodal Unlearning with Counterfactual Guidance and On-Policy Self-Distillation

    CUSE: Fine-Grained Multimodal Unlearning with Counterfactual Guidance and On-Policy Self-Distillation

    CUSE: Fine-Grained Multimodal Unlearning with Counterfactual Guidance and On-Policy Self-Distillation

    arXiv:2610.14763v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can reproduce sensitive, copyrighted, or unsafe information from their training data. Effective unlearning must remove target information while preserving non-target content, even within the same response. Existing methods typically apply uniform forgetting objectives to complete responses and rely on fixed, off-policy supervision, resulting in coarse token control and misalignment with the model's current behavior. We propose CUSE, a Counterfactual-guided Unlearning framework via on-policy Self-distillation for multimodal large language models. It first constructs counterfactual inputs by removing target-related evidence and uses the resulting changes in token probabilities to identify which tokens require stronger forgetting. It then distills token-level forgetting and retention targets on responses sampled from the current policy, with a frozen copy of the original model serving as the teacher model augmented with the corresponding forgetting- and retention-oriented privileged contexts. This design jointly determines what to forget and what to preserve. On MLLMU-Bench, CUSE reduces forget-set ROUGE-L by 33.6% while achieving 1.2% higher retain-set ROUGE-L than the strongest baseline.

    Fallback brief based on the available RSS feed; no unsupported details have been added.

    Source: arXiv
    Original article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14763

  • Relational Semantic Grounding for Test-Time Discovery

    Relational Semantic Grounding for Test-Time Discovery

    Relational Semantic Grounding for Test-Time Discovery

    arXiv:2610.14721v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-Time Discovery (TTD) aims to recognize known classes and detect novel ones from a continuous unlabeled test stream after deployment. Existing TTD methods mainly rely on visual clustering or prototype comparison, and can only assign anonymous labels to discovered classes, leaving them difficult to interpret in open-world applications. In this paper, we propose SEGA, a Semantic Grounding with Attributes framework for TTD. SEGA leverages large language models to generate attribute-rich descriptions for known classes and constructs an attribute-anchored visual-semantic space during training. At test time, we introduce Relational Semantic Grounding (RSG), which grounds unknown samples with similar and dissimilar known-class anchors, prompts the LLM to generate candidate concepts, and reranks them in the learned semantic space. The selected concept is further used for confidence-guided test-time semantic stabilization. By coupling attribute-level semantic alignment with relational concept grounding, SEGA transforms anonymous test-time clusters into interpretable semantic concepts. Experiments show that SEGA improves TTD baselines with the promise of semantic grounding for open-world.

    Fallback brief based on the available RSS feed; no unsupported details have been added.

    Source: arXiv
    Original article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14721

  • MHWA: Multi-timescale Hierarchical World-Action Model

    MHWA: Multi-timescale Hierarchical World-Action Model

    MHWA: Multi-timescale Hierarchical World-Action Model

    arXiv:2610.14727v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autoregressive world models have emerged as a powerful paradigm for sample efficient decision making, yet their open loop rollouts often exhibit increasing drift that leads to error accumulation even within a relatively small planning horizon. Hierarchical temporal abstraction is a natural candidate to mitigate such drift by reducing the effective prediction horizon; however, existing hierarchical designs can introduce added structural and conceptual complexity, sometimes making them difficult to control and limiting gains over flat baselines. To this end, we introduce MHWA (Multi-timescale Hierarchical World-Action model), which employs a strided high level context channel to reduce global context update frequency, effectively curbing the propagation of compounding drift. Crucially, via context aware routing, the gating network dynamically reconfigures a low level mixture of experts by using both global context and current observations, thereby enabling flexible high-low coordination, helping alleviate interference commonly observed in static hierarchies. Empirically, using RLiable's seed-by-game aggregation, MHWA (77M parameters) achieves an IQM human normalized score (HNS) of 0.884 across three training seeds on a 14-game Atari subset using 10% subsampled offline data, outperforming a matched JOWA-70M baseline (0.529) and achieving numerically comparable performance to JOWA-150M while using nearly half the parameters and 70.88% fewer training FLOPs per sequence.

    Fallback brief based on the available RSS feed; no unsupported details have been added.

    Source: arXiv
    Original article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14727

  • Think in Strategies, Act with Tools: Traceable Agentic Optimization for Combinatorial Problems

    Think in Strategies, Act with Tools: Traceable Agentic Optimization for Combinatorial Problems

    Think in Strategies, Act with Tools: Traceable Agentic Optimization for Combinatorial Problems

    arXiv:2610.14736v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Optimization by PROmpting (OPRO) directly leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate candidate solutions through natural-language prompting. However, OPRO's optimization process is difficult to track, which prevents LLMs from capturing useful information accumulated over previous iterations, thereby limiting solution quality. To address this limitation, we propose a Tool-Augmented Strategic Agent (TASA) which summarizes and exploits trajectory to improve solution quality. Specifically, TASA plans the strategy for each step based on the optimization trajectory, which decomposes the optimization process into traceable strategy selections. Moreover, we leverage LLM to construct problem-specific tools and introduce a strategy-guided adaptive tool planner, which efficiently utilizes the information of trajectory to update solutions. We establish local convergence under persistent exploration and evaluate the complete framework under a shared candidate-evaluation budget. The results support its solution quality and the traceability of strategy-guided search.

    Fallback brief based on the available RSS feed; no unsupported details have been added.

    Source: arXiv
    Original article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14736

  • SAGE: Pushing 2-Bit Vector-Quantized LLMs toward Real-World Usability

    SAGE: Pushing 2-Bit Vector-Quantized LLMs toward Real-World Usability

    SAGE: Pushing 2-Bit Vector-Quantized LLMs toward Real-World Usability

    arXiv:2610.14745v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Extreme low-bit weight-only quantization is an effective approach to reducing the deployment costs of large language models. Below 3 bits, scalar quantization often suffers severe accuracy loss, while vector quantization (VQ) better preserves accuracy through more expressive joint encoding. However, existing VQ methods still exhibit substantial degradation on real-world tasks, and two design challenges remain underexplored: (1) protecting sensitive weight channels within jointly encoded vectors; and (2) allocating a fixed bit budget among representation components, such as direction and radius, to suit different weight matrices. To address these challenges, we propose SAGE: Split Adaptation and Grouping by Energy for weight-only vector quantization. First, Energy-Stratified Grouping (ESG) couples channel grouping with activation-weighted fitting, grouping channels from different energy tiers within each subvector to prioritize sensitive channels. Second, Adaptive Bit Split (ABS) balances direction-codebook capacity and radius precision per matrix, selecting the split with the lowest activation-weighted reconstruction error under a fixed budget. Across benchmarks covering knowledge, mathematics, code generation, instruction following, and tool use, SAGE achieves state-of-the-art performance in the 2-bit quantization setting. On Qwen3-30B-A3B, it retains 95.3% of the BF16 model's average benchmark score. With our custom-designed CUDA kernel, SAGE delivers up to a 2.55-fold non-streaming end-to-end speedup over FP16. The code is available at https://github.com/Zincwolf/sage.

    Fallback brief based on the available RSS feed; no unsupported details have been added.

    Source: arXiv
    Original article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14745

  • Joint Discrete and SE(3) Diffusion for Protein Interface Design

    Joint Discrete and SE(3) Diffusion for Protein Interface Design

    Joint Discrete and SE(3) Diffusion for Protein Interface Design

    arXiv:2610.14699v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The design of high-affinity, target-specific protein binders is central to the development of modern therapeutics. However, existing protein-generation methods remain limited in this setting, as many generated designs fail to simultaneously achieve geometric and physicochemical complementarity at binding interfaces. To address this challenge, we introduce PIDiff, a physicochemically enhanced multimodal diffusion framework for protein-protein complex design. PIDiff jointly designs target-conditioned protein sequences and structures by coupling diffusion in discrete sequence space with diffusion on the continuous (SE(3)) structural manifold. At its core, PIDiff employs PIFormer, a novel architecture that interleaves geometry-aware invariant point attention with global sequence self-attention. We further curate PIBench, a protein-protein complex dataset with diverse target scaffolds derived from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We first pretrain PIDiff on PIBench and subsequently fine-tune it for two therapeutically relevant applications: minibinder design and antibody design. PPFrame consistently outperforms baseline methods across sequence design success rate, structure binding energy, and sequence-structure co-designability on all tasks.

    Fallback brief based on the available RSS feed; no unsupported details have been added.

    Source: arXiv
    Original article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14699

  • DSABench: Benchmarking Source Discovery, Coordination, and Execution for Multi-Database Agents

    DSABench: Benchmarking Source Discovery, Coordination, and Execution for Multi-Database Agents

    DSABench: Benchmarking Source Discovery, Coordination, and Execution for Multi-Database Agents

    arXiv:2610.14700v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most text-to-SQL benchmarks provide the target database. In a large data catalog, however, choosing the sources is part of the problem: an agent must find every database needed for a request, determine how their results fit together, and execute the resulting workflow. We present DSABench to evaluate these capabilities jointly. Its 815 human-reviewed tasks draw on Spider, BIRD, and LiveSQLBench; 618 require several databases to contribute, and 105 allow more than one interpretation of the required sources. Executable contracts define source participation, cross-source dependencies, and source-local execution, while RouteEnv lets agents inspect public catalog evidence without revealing the gold annotations. In our routing-only study across seven model backends, the highest RA-Set score is 60.55%, compared with a highest RA-Graph score of 34.66% when coordination requirements are included. The gap becomes more pronounced when execution is required. Across four backends, median non-privileged Route+Exec-Graph success ranges from 6.69% to 7.98% without clarification and from 11.44% to 13.25% with one clarification; the best observed clarified configuration reaches 16.99%. On ambiguous tasks, clarification improves exact branch-source recovery by 39.8-43.2 percentage points. These findings illustrate why retrieving plausible databases or producing correct local SQL is not enough: an agent must carry the right information through the entire multi-database workflow.

    Fallback brief based on the available RSS feed; no unsupported details have been added.

    Source: arXiv
    Original article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14700

  • How to Build a Benchmark That Actually Measures Taste

    How to Build a Benchmark That Actually Measures Taste

    How to Build a Benchmark That Actually Measures Taste

    arXiv:2610.14707v2 Announce Type: new Abstract: Expert-aligned "taste" benchmarks should reward craft judgment, not the ability to game the test. We introduce TasteBench, a pairwise good-vs-bad benchmark across visual, brand, book, and tech items under a frozen rubric with expert-only gold (panel n>=3; percent agreement >=0.60 primary gate; weak engagement labels train/analysis-only), together with a control protocol that separates craft judgment from test-gaming. Applying the protocol to a Round-1 pilot (primary_human_expert; three biological human experts; n=250 pairs) surfaces and quantifies three validity threats: two construction artifacts that inflate the trivial-baseline layer, and a difficulty ceiling that inflates every score. (1) Position: the preferred item is slot A with probability 0.956, so an always_item_a policy scores 0.956 (fair chance 0.5). (2) Lexical leakage: a filename token cue scores 0.912. (3) Difficulty ceiling: craft domains show near-ceiling human agreement (book/brand/tech 1.0), and even under A/B randomization (eval_assignment_seed7; gold_side_A ~0.47) all five VLM cards reach 1.0 on craft, with only visual separating (~0.84-0.91; a post-hoc hard subset, n=107, leaves craft at 1.0). The protocol (expert-only gold, a weak-label firewall, side randomization at construction, filename scrubbing, and hard filters) makes each artifact measurable and, for the two construction artifacts, correctable; we release a reference eval harness and a side-randomization tool, and show the tool removes the position skew (0.916 to 0.495/0.505). The result is a calibrated view of what the benchmark does and does not yet measure: position and leakage are fixable, whereas the craft-domain ceiling is a pair-difficulty limit that Round-2 must address. We do not evaluate engagement, era/circle conditioning, or calibration here, and we claim no general taste SOTA.

    Fallback brief based on the available RSS feed; no unsupported details have been added.

    Source: arXiv
    Original article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14707